|
Format (after title)mirva wrote:
Is it still ok to use Album Name (Limited Edition) (or anything like that) or should the format just go to the format field and nowhere else? I couldn't find any information from the submission guidelines against or for this matter.
posted 2 months ago. (
permalink |
report
)
mirva wrote:
Yeah, that's what I thought too. Folks just still keep on adding it after the title, so I tried to find something to refer to and couldn't find anything about the subject. :)
posted 2 months ago. (
permalink |
report
)
BigTone wrote:
mirvaIs it still ok to use Album Name (Limited Edition) (or anything like that) or should the format just go to the format field and nowhere else? It should clearly go in the Format field and nowhere else, unless there is clear evidence it's part of the title (I'm not aware of any such cases off the top of my head). I've brought this up before (last post in http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/169600 ) but with no response whatsoever. hwanin wrote:
why we should mention the fomat twice as long as it has a separated field in the submission procedure?
posted 2 months ago. (
permalink |
report
)
I agree ^^, only into format field and nowhere else. Killian600 wrote:
For the group/band listing or label listing it IS very practical, to see some added information such as limited edition, or so. In the listings, so-called "First Press Edition" are shorted, only "Fir" is readable. In the label listing, this isn't very helpful, as nobody can actually know what it means. I would rather use those terms in a case by case basis.
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
SmotheredHope wrote:
Killian600For the group/band listing or label listing it IS very practical, to see some added information such as limited edition, or so. In the listings, so-called "First Press Edition" are shorted, only "Fir" is readable. In the label listing, this isn't very helpful, as nobody can actually know what it means. This is more of a display issue that can be sorted out in a better way than adding the format to title, IMO. choenyi wrote:
If we add something but it's not actually part of the title, at that point we're just making stuff up.
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
silverleaf wrote:
Here's an example with good scans of cover & CDs http://www.discogs.com/release/1213852
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
For those who don't have it. The spines do not say the Limited Double Edition portion, but it's on the Front Cover and both CDs. Reply to this topic? |
| My Discogs | Submissions Watchlist Drafts Collection Wantlist more... |
| Help | Contributing to Discogs Quick Start Guide Buying Selling Help Forums more... |
| About Discogs Developers API Widgets | |
| Discogs™ website Copyright © 2008 Discogs Terms of Service Privacy Policy | |